AI Replaced My Lawyer
Add me on Instagram: GPStephan
PROMOTIONAL OFFER: Get Up To 12 FREE STOCKS when you sign up and make a deposit using my paid affiliate link for WeBull:
GET MY WEEKLY EMAIL MARKET RECAP NEWSLETTER:
The YouTube Creator Academy:
Learn EXACTLY how to get your first 1000 subscribers on YouTube, rank videos on the front page of searches, grow your following, and turn that into another income source: – $100 OFF WITH CODE 100OFF
My ENTIRE Camera and Recording Equipment:
For business inquiries, you can reach me at grahamstephanbusiness@gmail.com
*Some of the links and other products that appear on this video are from companies which Graham Stephan will earn an affiliate commission or referral bonus. Graham Stephan is part of an affiliate network and receives compensation for sending traffic to partner sites. The content in this video is accurate as of the posting date. Some of the offers mentioned may no longer be available. This is not investment advice.
Using AI in court would be wild.
People have tried, and its gone very poorly
People once thought seeing cybertrucks on roads would be wild too.
2nd seat for PC 😂
@@andybaldmanand it’s gone about as poorly as AI in court lol, seeing those rust boxes is kind of funny
QBO has tried to use AI to replace accountants for years and it sucks. I’m not worried. There’s only so much it can do before you need a weighted, considerate response
For simple routine bookkeeping, AI works fine. But once you get into subjective accounting tasks such as implementing internal controls or analyzing financial statements, AI still has a long road ahead. CPAs will still in much need for the future, as a legally liable professional at the very least lol
Lawyers are getting slammed in court right now for using it. Its bad about hallucinating.
The newer models are better already, you just have to prompt it properly
@@ruinveststhe latest model has 16trillion parameters compared to the previous with 1.7 trillion and it’s only slightly better in 30 years we will be laughing about how we thought this was the correct way to do model architecture
Yes most people don’t realize this “AI” is just advanced statistical answers. It has no understanding of your question.
There has already been several incidents of lawyers using ChatGPT in court filings just to find out the AI cited a bunch of court rulings that didn’t exist to answer legal questions.
Once Parag Agrawals Parrallel drops in this problem will get solved. People are working on it its just a matter of time
those are old news. ai today is leaps and bounds from literally yesterday.
so the people we pay won’t even write their own stuff anymore that’s why AI has funding
Reading through the comments, no one said it was going to replace lawyers right now but eventually as ChatGPT and other AI learning models will eventually replace lawyers. As the profession is primarily about reading case law, and making decision based on the law and legal precedence it will not be long before it does a better job than a lawyer who would have to spend weeks or month to figure out the same thing.
AI in it’s current form is never going to have perfect context on anything and as a result it will never fully surpass or replace these professions.
Graham is asking singular questions about fixed scenarios and getting moderately good response but the second you start adding context and two-party nuance to a scenario the LLMs turn into pure slop.
It’s the same scenario with coding and why devs are not going anywhere. AI is great at throwing up static pages or scenarios but as the context window goes up it turns into gibberish.
Someone is needed to guide it through and piece together complexity and we’re already realizing this isn’t going to change anytime soon.
@@Alex-vo2ewmy man, chatgpt is already smarter than everyone on earth and it just started, imagine how insanely intelligent it will be in the future, you can’t even comprehend how powerful it is
Many people also go to AI now for financial advice ….
True. I don’t need an assistant anymore lol
As a professional in RE law, ChatGPT is not 100%. Maybe 80%.
this quite literally can only help an average man in an average situation. People with a lot of money it still makes sense to just use a lawyer. Because AI can make mistakes just because it’s not common doesn’t mean It can’t happen.
It writes beautifully but it often refers to defences and cases that simply don’t exist. I’ve found this with my own research on other topics when using it. It refers to outdated information or sources that are not real
When my mum passed away. I didn’t hire one lawyer. I solely used chatgpt and sometimes reddit to close everything. Note, She died without a will.
I’m a lawyer. AI is garbage for most things a lawyer needs to do.
Cope
give it 5 years
Such as?
@@ar9214 doing any actual legal research. It just makes up rule statements
@@baconnationalist9072 if that’s the extent of what we’re talking about, then I would have to disagree.
Granted, there’s a huge variance in how skilled people are in prompting the models for good research, but in my experience (coming from the engineering side) and working on them, when I’ve needed to do research for my LLC, for litigation that I’ve been involved with, the models do great there (I have similarly to this video just put multiple of them in deep research and then compare them against one another, iterated a few times and then sent to my lawyer for approval).
The lawyer agreed with 99% most of the time , with some small opinionated tweaks to what the AI found.
You don’t hire a good lawyer because they know the law any better. You hire a good lawyer because they know all the judges.
They’ll be AI, too, don’t worry
2023 October I was facing armed robbery, reckless endangerment, and attempted murder. I hired a lawyer that was buddies with the DA and got released in a few days 😂, can’t make ts up
@@jovanny4763I would have tipped 500 dollars 😂 cause goddamn that’s damn near your life in prison.
@@SunnyIceberghe was 7 thousand for two sessions
@@SunnyIceberg500?? You realize this is nothing for a lawyer in the US right? I good “tip” would be minimum 5000
You hire a lawyer more as an insurance. If the contract is bad and you went through Chat GPT, that’s on you for having a bad contract. Meanwhile, if a lawyer drafts a bad contract, you sue the lawyer for your damages.
Naw lawyers are gonna stop screwing people 😂
Good lawyers KNOW people, judges, prosecutors and other lawyers. That makes more of a difference than anything else. That’s how law really works.
anyone could open the laws and read what was written there before any gpt. You need a lawyer for someone who will come to talk to your wife about the divorce instead of you, or someone who will try to get you out of jail while you’re there.
I sooo agree with that. I fought my HOA in court just using self representation and chat Gpt. I won and did not have to pay a penny to a lawyer. As long you can make the right prompt, you should be fine.
Remember guys graham won the lottery by being a YouTuber with success and then he invested during a huge bull run. His success isn’t his own in any way and his advice should be taken with huge grains of salt.
Thank god I learned a couple trades. Ai isn’t repairing 100 year old houses or remodeling a bathroom anytime soon. And here I almost fell for the “ learn to code”